Unique Outcomes - Altering the Dominant Negative Story: Which statement best captures this technique?

Unique Outcomes - Altering the Dominant Negative Story: Which statement best captures this technique?

• A. Analyzing roots in family history.
• B. Focusing on a life story divergent from the problem-saturated narrative.
• C. Encouraging avoidance of the issue altogether.
• D. Emphasizing the problem as the core identity.

Answer: (B)

Unique outcomes focus on moments when the problem doesn’t control the person’s behavior, using those times to rewrite the client’s story. This technique looks for a life narrative that diverges from the problem-saturated script, showing that the client can act in ways that contradict the dominant negative storyline. By highlighting these exceptions, the therapist helps the client see agency, resources, and alternative identities beyond the problem. That’s why focusing on a life story that diverges from the problem-saturated narrative is the best fit. It captures the idea of finding and amplifying those rare episodes where things worked differently, which can shift the client’s sense of self and possibility. The other options don’t fit because analyzing family history, avoiding the issue, or treating the problem as the core identity moves away from reframing the client’s experience and identifying those exceptional moments where positive change occurred.

Unique outcomes focus on moments when the problem doesn’t control the person’s behavior, using those times to rewrite the client’s story. This technique looks for a life narrative that diverges from the problem-saturated script, showing that the client can act in ways that contradict the dominant negative storyline. By highlighting these exceptions, the therapist helps the client see agency, resources, and alternative identities beyond the problem.

That’s why focusing on a life story that diverges from the problem-saturated narrative is the best fit. It captures the idea of finding and amplifying those rare episodes where things worked differently, which can shift the client’s sense of self and possibility. The other options don’t fit because analyzing family history, avoiding the issue, or treating the problem as the core identity moves away from reframing the client’s experience and identifying those exceptional moments where positive change occurred.